Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorVoronin, Ivan A.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorManrique-Millones, Denissees_PE
dc.contributor.authorVasin, Georgy M.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorMillones-Rivalles, Rosa-Berthaes_PE
dc.contributor.authorManrique-Pino, Oscares_PE
dc.contributor.authorFernandez-Rios, Natalyes_PE
dc.contributor.authorMarakshina, Yulia A.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorLobaskova, M. M.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorSymanyuk, Elvira E.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorPecherkina, Anna A.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorAgeeva, Irina A. .es_PE
dc.contributor.authorLysenkova, Irina A.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorIsmatullina, Victoria I.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorSitnikova, Maria A.es_PE
dc.contributor.authorMalykh, Sergey B.es_PE
dc.contributor.otherMillones-Rivalles, Rosa-Berthaes_PE
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T16:46:23Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T16:46:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationVoronin, I.A., Manrique-Millones, D., Vasin, G.M., Millones-Rivalles, R.B., Manrique-Pino, O., Fernandez-Rios, N., Marakshina, Y.A., Lobaskova, M.M., Symanyuk, E.E., Pecherkina, A.A., Ageeva, I.A., Lysenkova, I.A., Ismatullina, V.I., Sitnikova, M.A. & Malykh, S.B. (2020). Coping Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Peru. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(4), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0404es_PE
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/12456
dc.descriptionIndexado en Scopuses_PE
dc.description.abstractBackground. The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected people around the world to severe stress, evoking a variety of coping responses. Coping responses can be broadly classified into four strategies: 1) problem-focused coping; 2) emotion-focused coping; 3) socially supported coping; and 4) avoidance. While there is a wide variability of individual coping responses, to some extent they are also culturally specific. Objective. This study aimed to compare the differences in the prevalence and factor structure of coping responses during COVID-19 pandemic in three countries: Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Peru. Design. The sample included 501 participants from Russia, 456 participants from Kyrgyzstan, and 354 participants from Peru. The mean age of participants was 28 years in Russia (SD = 13.5); 24 years in Kyrgyzstan (SD = 10.0); and 30 years in Peru (SD = 12.3). In Russia and Kyrgyzstan, coping strategies were assessed with an abbreviated Russian adaptation of the COPE (Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced) questionnaire. In Peru, coping responses were assessed using the Spanish version of the Brief COPE questionnaire. The average scores from fifteen COPE scales were used as the input data for linear modelling and factor analysis. Results. The coping scores varied substantially within each country. Differences between countries accounted for 17.7% of the total variability in religious coping; 15.8% in acceptance; 13.9% in mental disengagement; and less than 7% in the other coping strategies. No difference in the prevalence of coping responses was found between Russian and Kyrgyz participants after accounting for age and gender. In all three countries the coping responses were associated with the same four coping domains: problem-focused coping, socially supported coping, avoidance, and emotion-focused coping. Four factors explained up to 44% of the total variation in the COPE scores. Religious coping and mental disengagement were classified into different coping domains in the three countries. Conclusion. The results suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, people from different countries apply the full range of coping responses within the four universal coping strategies. Religious coping and mental disengagement differed the most across the countries, suggesting that some coping behaviors can take on different roles within the system of coping responses to stressful events. We attribute these differences to differing cultural and socioeconomic characteristics, and the different measures taken by governments in response to COVID-19.es_EN
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherRusssian Psychological Societyes_PE
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2074-6857
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesses_PE
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - Ulimaes_PE
dc.sourceUniversidad de Limaes_PE
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_PE
dc.subjectConducta humanaes_PE
dc.subjectEstudios interculturaleses_PE
dc.subjectHuman behavioren_EN
dc.subjectCross-cultural studiesen_EN
dc.subject.classificationPsicología / Psicología clínicaes_PE
dc.titleCoping Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Perues_EN
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlees_PE
dc.type.otherArtículo en Scopuses_PE
dc.identifier.journalPsychology in Russia: State of the Art
dc.publisher.countryRUes_PE
dc.description.peer-reviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.02.04es_PE
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0404
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess