Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

dc.contributor.authorVoronin, Ivan A.
dc.contributor.authorManrique Millones, Denisse Lisette
dc.contributor.authorVasin, Georgy M.
dc.contributor.authorMillones Rivalles, Rosa Bertha
dc.contributor.authorManrique Pino, Oscar
dc.contributor.authorFernandez Rios, Nataly
dc.contributor.authorMarakshina, Yulia A.
dc.contributor.authorLobaskova, M. M.
dc.contributor.authorSymanyuk, Elvira E.
dc.contributor.authorPecherkina, Anna A.
dc.contributor.authorAgeeva, Irina A. .
dc.contributor.authorLysenkova, Irina A.
dc.contributor.authorIsmatullina, Victoria I.
dc.contributor.authorSitnikova, Maria A.
dc.contributor.authorMalykh, Sergey B.
dc.contributor.otherMillones Rivalles, Rosa Bertha
dc.date.accessioned2021-02-11T16:46:23Z
dc.date.available2021-02-11T16:46:23Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.citationVoronin, I.A., Manrique-Millones, D., Vasin, G.M., Millones-Rivalles, R.B., Manrique-Pino, O., Fernandez-Rios, N., Marakshina, Y.A., Lobaskova, M.M., Symanyuk, E.E., Pecherkina, A.A., Ageeva, I.A., Lysenkova, I.A., Ismatullina, V.I., Sitnikova, M.A. & Malykh, S.B. (2020). Coping Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Peru. Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, 13(4), 55-74. https://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0404es_PE
dc.identifier.issn2074-6857
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/12456
dc.descriptionIndexado en Scopuses_PE
dc.description.abstractBackground. The COVID-19 pandemic has subjected people around the world to severe stress, evoking a variety of coping responses. Coping responses can be broadly classified into four strategies: 1) problem-focused coping; 2) emotion-focused coping; 3) socially supported coping; and 4) avoidance. While there is a wide variability of individual coping responses, to some extent they are also culturally specific. Objective. This study aimed to compare the differences in the prevalence and factor structure of coping responses during COVID-19 pandemic in three countries: Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Peru. Design. The sample included 501 participants from Russia, 456 participants from Kyrgyzstan, and 354 participants from Peru. The mean age of participants was 28 years in Russia (SD = 13.5); 24 years in Kyrgyzstan (SD = 10.0); and 30 years in Peru (SD = 12.3). In Russia and Kyrgyzstan, coping strategies were assessed with an abbreviated Russian adaptation of the COPE (Coping Orientations to Problems Experienced) questionnaire. In Peru, coping responses were assessed using the Spanish version of the Brief COPE questionnaire. The average scores from fifteen COPE scales were used as the input data for linear modelling and factor analysis. Results. The coping scores varied substantially within each country. Differences between countries accounted for 17.7% of the total variability in religious coping; 15.8% in acceptance; 13.9% in mental disengagement; and less than 7% in the other coping strategies. No difference in the prevalence of coping responses was found between Russian and Kyrgyz participants after accounting for age and gender. In all three countries the coping responses were associated with the same four coping domains: problem-focused coping, socially supported coping, avoidance, and emotion-focused coping. Four factors explained up to 44% of the total variation in the COPE scores. Religious coping and mental disengagement were classified into different coping domains in the three countries. Conclusion. The results suggest that during the COVID-19 pandemic, people from different countries apply the full range of coping responses within the four universal coping strategies. Religious coping and mental disengagement differed the most across the countries, suggesting that some coping behaviors can take on different roles within the system of coping responses to stressful events. We attribute these differences to differing cultural and socioeconomic characteristics, and the different measures taken by governments in response to COVID-19.es_PE
dc.formatapplication/pdfes_PE
dc.language.isoenges_PE
dc.publisherRusssian Psychological Societyes_PE
dc.relation.ispartofurn:issn:2074-6857
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/*
dc.sourceRepositorio Institucional - Ulimaes_PE
dc.sourceUniversidad de Limaes_PE
dc.subjectCOVID-19es_PE
dc.subjectConducta humanaes_PE
dc.subjectEstudios interculturaleses_PE
dc.subjectHuman behaviores_PE
dc.subjectCross-cultural studieses_PE
dc.subject.classificationPsicología / Psicología clínicaes_PE
dc.titleCoping Responses During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Russia, Kyrgyzstan, and Perues_PE
dc.typeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.description.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.otherArtículo en Scopuses_PE
ulima.areas.lineasdeinvestigacionComunicación y cultura / Psicologíaes_PE
dc.identifier.journalPsychology in Russia: State of the Artes_PE
dc.publisher.countryRUes_PE
dc.description.peer-reviewRevisión por pareses_PE
dc.subject.ocdehttps://purl.org/pe-repo/ocde/ford#2.02.04
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.11621/pir.2020.0404
dc.type.versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
ulima.autor.afiliacionUniversidad de Limaes_PE
ulima.autor.carreraNo figura en la lista del año 2020es_PE
dc.identifier.isni0000000121541816


Ficheros en el ítem

FicherosTamañoFormatoVer

No hay ficheros asociados a este ítem.

Este ítem aparece en la(s) siguiente(s) colección(ones)

Mostrar el registro sencillo del ítem

info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
Excepto si se señala otra cosa, la licencia del ítem se describe como info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess