Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy

Thumbnail
Date
2021
Author(s)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Responding to recent concerns about the reliability of the published literature in psychology and other disciplines, we formed the X-Phi Replicability Project (XRP) to estimate the reproducibility of experimental philosophy (osf.io/dvkpr). Drawing on a representative sample of 40 x-phi studies published between 2003 and 2015, we enlisted 20 research teams across 8 countries to conduct a high-quality replication of each study in order to compare the results to the original published findings. We found that x-phi studies – as represented in our sample – successfully replicated about 70% of the time. We discuss possible reasons for this relatively high replication rate in the field of experimental philosophy and offer suggestions for best research practices going forward.
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12724/12311
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9
How to cite
Cova, F., Strickland, B., Abatista, A., Allard, A., Andow, J., Attie, M., Beebe, J., Berniunas, R., Boudesseul, J., Colombo, M., Cushman, F., Diaz, R., N’Djaye Nikolai van Dongen, N., Dranseika, V., Earp, B.D., E B.D., Torres, A.G., Hannikainen, I., Hernández-Conde, J.V., Hu, W. & Jaquet, F. (2021). Estimating the Reproducibility of Experimental Philosophy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 12, 9-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-018-0400-9
Publisher
Springer
Subject
Journal
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
ISSN
1852-4206
Note
Corrección del artículo (10 de agosto de 2018): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-018-0407-2
 
Corrección del artículo (22 de junio de 2021): https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13164-021-00559-0
 
Collections